This was a super fun, quick read. I think I swallowed the whole thing up in about two hours. That said, it gives a lot of bang for your buck in terms of what it teaches in that time. Unlike other pop-math books, this is definitely adequate for the lay reader, and I highly recommend reading it because of Hannah's witty style and fun treatment of the subject.
A few representative summaries:
"The message for making yourself appear more attractive is clear. When going to a party to talk to potential partners, choose a friend to go with you who is as similar-looking to you as possible, except slightly less attractive. Having them there will make you seem like a better option."
"If you can handle the occasional cringe-inducing rejection, ultimately, taking the initiative will see you rewarded. It is always better to do the approaching than to sit back and wait for people to come to you. So aim high, and aim frequently: The math says so."
"As long as some people thing you're beautiful, you're much better off having some other people thank that you're ugly than having everyone think you're just quite cute."
"Why are there so many fantastic women in their thirties all competing for a seemingly tiny pool of eligible bachelors? When a weak bidder comes across a man that she likes, she is likely to pull out all the stops to compete for his attention. A strong bidder, on the other hand, confident that she presents a good match for any man, is less likely to go all-out, knowing that another, better man is probably waiting for her just around the corner. Seeing disinterest from the more attractive woman, the man will then settle down with the woman who shows him the most attention, taking him out of the dating pool. ... The result is the eligible bachelor paradox, and it comes with a clear, if slightly harsh take-home message: No matter how hot you are, if your goal is partnership, don't get complacent."
"Say you start dating when you're fifteen years old and would ideally like to settle down by the time you're forty. In the first 37 percent of your dating window (until just after your twenty-fourth birthday), you should reject everyone; use this time to get a feel for the market and a realistic expectation of what you can expect in a life partner. Once this rejection phase has passed, pick the next person who comes along who is better than everyone before you."
"The most successful relationships are the ones with a really low negativity threshold. In those relationships, couples allow each other to complain, and work together to constantly repair the tiny issues between them. In such a case, couples don't bottle up their feelings, and little things don't end up being blown completely out of proportion."
Funny, cohesive, readable, and relate-able. Great read!
Books of Note
Thursday, January 26, 2017
How Not To Be Wrong - Jordan Ellenberg
What a delightful read! How Not To Be Wrong is a deeply mathematical and philosophical book, traipsing a non-mathematical person's introduction to mathematics. I found it thoroughly enjoyable and witty, though I suspect that people without a STEM background won't be audibly laughing nearly as often as I did while reading this book. That said, this book contains a near even mix of accessible and muddy concepts, so the uninitiated is likely to find at least half of the book readable. My advice, give it a whirl and just skip the sections that don't make much sense. It was also really fun learning a bit about the history involved in a lot of math, and Ellenberg did a good job of weaving together a cohesive backstory in that regard.
Some favorite quotes:
On comparing yourself and on genius:
"What you learn after a long time in math--and I think the lesson applies much more broadly--is that there's always somebody ahead of you, whether they're right there in class with you or not. ... Nobody ever looks in the mirror and says, 'Let's face it, I'm smarter than Gauss.' And yet, in the last hundred years, the joined effort of all these dummies-compared-to-Gauss has produced the greatest flowering of mathematical knowledge the world has ever seen. ... Genius is a thing that happens, not a kind of person. ... One doesn't call [all the players on the football team, the coaching staff, and assistants] geniuses. But they create the conditions under which genius can take place."
"Improbable things happen a lot."
"If gambling is exciting, you're doing it wrong."
" 'God is, or He is not.' But to which side shall we incline? Reason can decide nothing here."
I also enjoyed the examples of:
The St. Petersburg Paradox, The counsel to miss more planes, The laffer curve, The Baltimore Stockbroker, and the healthy mistrust for published p-values.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)